About The CLJ       About Neil Boorstyn       Endorsements       Subscription Information       Contact Us       Log In  
 

The Copyright Law Journal  is unique in that it is written entirely by Neil Boorstyn. Mr. Boorstyn is recognized as one of the country’s leading copyright and computer law experts. His vast experience as a copyright lawyer, litigator, consultant, writer, lecturer, and teacher makes him especially qualified to provide the information you need with accuracy and authority.

Sample case and analysis
We invite you to read a sample case from The Copyright Law Journal, containing summary, facts, and extensive comments and practice tips from Neil Boorstyn.
View a sample case

In the latest issue of The Copyright Law Journal:

LEADSINGER, INC. v. BMG MUSIC PUBLISHING: The Ninth Circuit affirmed that a karaoke device that displays song lyrics in time with the song recordings is not covered by the compulsory license provisions of Section 115
GEORGE S. CHEN CORP. v. CADONA INTERNATIONAL, INC.: In a memorandum opinion marked "Not for Publication," a divided Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment in defendant’s favor because plaintiff’s true-to-life sculptures are not copyrightable
SCHROCK v. LEARNING CURVE INTERNATIONAL, INC.: The District Court concluded that photographs depicting toys are derivative works
SILVERSTEIN v. PENGUIN PUTNAM, INC.: On remand, the District Court ruled that plaintiff’s compilation of all of Dorothy Parker’s previously uncollected poems is not entitled to copyright protection
FOLLOW UP: Welles v. Turner; MGM v. Grokster; JCW Investments v. Novelty
BRIEFLY NOTED: Other recent cases of interest
 

PRACTICE TIPS

A statutory compulsory license is not available to manufacturers of records intended primarily for commercial users such as broadcasters, jukebox operators, and background music services
Where an artist creates a life-like sculpture depicting an animal, using skill, artistry, and imagination that are original, he is entitled to copyright protection, even if in some instances that protection may be thin
To be derivative, a work must recast, transform, or adapt a preexisting copyrightable work
While the choice of particular items out of a universe of available data may display selectivity, it might not display creativity

To read this and other issues, subscribe today

 

Money-back guarantee
Try a no-risk trial subscription to The Copyright Law Journal. You may cancel at any time to receive a full refund.
Subscribe today

  Already subscribed?
  Log in for the latest issue:

  User ID:
Password:
   
 
Need Log In help?

     
Privacy Policy    


The Copyright Law Journal :
Providing helpful guidance and practice tips since 1984